classical argument outline

1. The introduction, which warms up the audience, establishes goodwill and rapport with the readers, and announces the general theme or thesis of the argument.

I will start by describing the situation everyone is already familiar with: Korean city has so large number of population. Also I will explain medical science's advancement and its purpose. Then, I will shift attention to how Korean cities are vulnerable to disease. I will end with my thesis, "The Medical Detective Should be controlled by Korean Cities not by individuals or government." 

2. The narration, which summarizes relevant background material, provides any information the audience needs to know about the environment and circumstances that produce the argument, and set up the stakes-what’s at risk in this question. In academic writing, this often takes the form of a literature review.

I will show the examples of overseas example about the Medical Detective by person. Also this time, I will analogy the limitation of individuals and I will argue that these limitation can be solved by city's work. I will give a brief possibility about this .

3. The confirmation,which lays out in a logical order (usually strongest to weakest or most obvious to most subtle) the claims that support the thesis, providing evidence for each claim.

I will start by examining many example's limitation that can be solved by city's work. Then, I will continue show the examples of Korea's Medical Detectives and its limitation. I will reveal that the cities can provide solution to solve the Korean limitation by explaining Korean city's ability. 

4. The refutation and concession, which looks at opposing viewpoints to the writer’s claims, anticipating objections from the audience, and allowing as much of the opposing viewpoints as possible without weakening the thesis.

I will concede that Medical Detective is a field of a medical science. However, I will argue that if city help this area by providing supports, this work can be better than before. 

5. The summation, which provides a strong conclusion, amplifying the force of the argument,  and showing the readers that this solution is the best at meeting the circumstances.

I will close with a summary of my previous points, then a brief consideration of the unquantifiable abilities of the human brain, like emotions and creativity that demonstrate a nuanced level of intelligence that computers have not even started to approach. I will end with a reaffirmation of my original thesis.